figshare
Browse
1/1
3 files

Moral Scenarios Manipulating the Intention to Harm and the Outcome of the Action - Set 1

Version 4 2016-07-19, 07:34
Version 3 2016-06-13, 13:00
Version 2 2016-06-13, 12:29
Version 1 2016-06-11, 10:54
dataset
posted on 2016-07-19, 07:34 authored by Laëtitia LeloupLaëtitia Leloup, Dana SamsonDana Samson
We provide here 64 moral scenarios manipulating the intention to harm of the protagonist (intention to harm vs. non intention to harm) and the outcome of his/her action (harmful outcome vs. no harm caused). The crossing of these two variables leads to neutral scenarios (no intention to harm and no harm caused), accidental harm scenarios (no intention to harm but harmful outcome), attempted harm scenarios (intention to harm but no harm caused) and intentional harm scenarios (intention to harm and harmful outcome). All 64 scenarios are written in 4 different versions to conform to the 4 types of scenarios.

These stimuli were used in the following study:

Leloup, L., Dongo Miletich, D., Andriet, G., Vandermeeren, Y., & Samson, D. (2016). Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 355.


History