DATASET
DATASET
DATASET
1/1
Effects of nutritional deprivation on development and behavior in the subsocial bee Ceratina calcarata (Hymenoptera: Xylocopinae)
dataset
posted on 2017-11-13, 20:17 authored by Sarah P. Lawson, Salena L. Helmreich, Sandra M. RehanAbstract
By manipulating resources or dispersal opportunities, mothers can
force offspring to remain at the nest to help raise siblings, creating a
division of labor. In the subsocial bee Ceratina calcarata, mothers
manipulate the quantity and quality of pollen provided to the first
female offspring, producing a dwarf eldest daughter that is physically
smaller and behaviorally subordinate. This daughter forages for her
siblings and forgoes her own reproduction. To understand how the
mother’s manipulation of pollen affects the physiology and behavior of
her offspring, we manipulated the amount of pollen provided to
offspring and measured the effects of pollen quantity on offspring
development, adult body size and behavior. We found that by
experimentally manipulating pollen quantities we could recreate
the dwarf eldest daughter phenotype, demonstrating how nutrient
deficiency alone can lead to the development of a worker-like
daughter. Specifically, by reducing the pollen and nutrition to
offspring, we significantly reduced adult body size and lipid stores,
creating significantly less aggressive, subordinate individuals.
Worker behavior in an otherwise solitary bee begins to explain how
maternal manipulation of resources could lead to the development of
social organization and reproductive hierarchies, a major step in the
transition to highly social behaviors.
Pollen manipulation- dataset pollen consumed and head width and development data
Early stage larvae and eggs were removed from nests, weighed using
a Mettler analytical balance (accuracy 0.01 mg) and randomly
assigned to a control group or one of two treatment groups. The
pollen of the control group remained unmanipulated. For the
treatment groups, approximately 1/3 of the pollen ball was removed
from one group and added to the other group. Both treatment groups
were reweighed and offspring and pollen ball were placed in PCR
tubes in the incubator at 25°C with 50% humidity until reaching
their final molt. Offspring from later developmental stages were
raised in the incubator as additional controls. Every other day, the
development of the offspring was assessed. The head width and sex were
recorded for all brood that reached adulthood. Sex was determined
by counting the number of metasomal terga; females have six
segments, while males have seven (Rehan and Richards, 2010a). To quantify the exact amount of pollen consumed,
we calculated the amount of pollen provided minus the amount of
pollen remaining when offspring began pupation.Lipid quantification- dataset lipid quanitifications
Lipid quantification
To quantify body lipids from lab-reared adult bees raised on
manipulated pollen quantities, we followed methods previously
published for honey bees (Toth and Robinson, 2005) and solitary
bees (Richards and Packer, 1994; O’Neill et al., 2015). Briefly, bees
previously frozen at −80°C (see ‘Behavioral assays’, below) were
placed in a homogenizer tube and ground with a glass rod. Extraction
was carried out by addition of 5 ml of 2:1 chloroform:methanol
solvent overnight. To purify the sample, we poured the solvent and
sample through glass wool and rinsed with 2 ml of 2:1 chloroform:
methanol. The sample was quantified using a Spectramax 250
spectrophotometer and compared with a standard curve of 0, 10, 50,
100 and 500 µl of cholesterol in petroleum ether.
Behavioral assays- dataset circle tube assays
To quantify the behavioral effects of nutritional addition or
reduction, we used circle tube assays to observe behavioral
interactions between age and size-matched treatment and control
individuals. Pairs were observed for 20 min and
all interactions were documented. Interactions, when bees were
within one body length of one another, were classified into four
categories previously published by Rehan and Richards (2013):
aggression, avoidance, tolerance and following. Briefly, aggressive
behaviors include nudging, biting or C-posturing, when the bee
curls its abdomen under the thorax, displaying both mandibles and
sting. Avoidance behaviors include backing away from or reversing
18 deg to move away from the other bee. Passing, and antenna-toantenna
or head-to-head contact were considered tolerant behaviors.
Following has been classified as a cooperative behavior in some
communal species (McConnell-Garner and Kukuk, 1997; Boesi
and Polidori, 2011), a subordinate behavior in some eusocial
species (Breed et al., 1978; Michener, 1990) and as a dominant
behavior in other species (West-Eberhard, 1979). Because of the
uncertainty of the meaning of this interaction, following behaviors
were classified separately. After behavioral trials, all bees were
killed at −80°C for later lipid quantification. To account for
differences in paired circle tube assays, we compared the relative
differences in behavioral frequencies. All differences between pair
members were calculated as (value for treatment bee, pollen added
or removed)−(value for control bee).