Data_Sheet_1_On-Reading (Chinese-Style Pronunciation) Predominance Over Kun-Reading (Native Japanese Pronunciation) in Japanese Semantic Dementia.docx
Japanese kanji (morphograms) have two ways of reading: on-reading (Chinese-style pronunciation) and kun-reading (native Japanese pronunciation). It is known that some Japanese patients with semantic dementia read kanji with on-reading but not with kun-reading. To characterize further reading impairments of patients with semantic dementia, we analyzed data from a total of 9 patients who underwent reading and writing tests of kanji and kana (Japanese phonetic writing) and on-kun reading tests containing two-character kanji words with on-on reading, kun-kun reading, and specific (so-called Jukujikun or irregular kun) reading. The results showed that on-reading preceding (pronouncing first with on-reading) and kun-reading deletion (inability to recall kun-reading) were observed in nearly all patients. In the on-kun reading test, on-reading (57.6% correct), kun-reading (46.6% correct), and specific-reading (30.0% correct) were more preserved in this decreasing order (phonology-to-semantics gradient), although on-reading and kun-reading did not significantly differ in performance, according to a more rigorous analysis after adjusting for word frequency (and familiarity). Furthermore, on-substitution (changing to on-reading) errors in kun-reading words (27.0%) were more frequent than kun-substitution (changing to kun-reading) errors in on-reading words (4.0%). These results suggest that kun-reading is more predominantly disturbed than on-reading, probably because kun-reading and specific-reading are closely associated with the meaning of words.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.460020402
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.382
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.030
- https://doi.org//10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6
- https://doi.org//10.1080/13554790490507623
- https://doi.org//10.4992/jjpsy.48.105
- https://doi.org//10.1097/00006231-200401000-00010
- https://doi.org//10.1212/wnl.51.6.1546
- https://doi.org//10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.169
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.011
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2004/305194
- https://doi.org//10.1136/jnnp.57.5.609
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0022-510x(00)00363-4
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.067
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00426-016-0764-3
- https://doi.org//10.1093/brain/awn300
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.014
- https://doi.org//10.1080/13554794.2020.1788608