figshare
Browse
IMAGE
ef6d33ae95eb5ec29693c6846f05d452f3e88b1e.jpg (112.98 kB)
IMAGE
57c423d591f21b9255cfd7dbe296819e5371b499.jpg (5.9 kB)
IMAGE
62007bb69cd14a74d9d4e2c584d5790381306877.jpg (92.26 kB)
IMAGE
f840635c859cb1885f238c74afc50fdc18084f07.jpg (5.76 kB)
1/0
4 files

Clinical genomics and precision medicine

dataset
posted on 2022-10-11, 07:14 authored by Sérgio D. J. Pena, Eduardo Tarazona-Santos

Abstract Precision Medicine emerges from the genomic paradigm of health and disease. For precise molecular diagnoses of genetic diseases, we must analyze the Whole Exome (WES) or the Whole Genome (WGS). By not needing exon capture, WGS is more powerful to detect single nucleotide variants and copy number variants. In healthy individuals, we can observe monogenic highly penetrant variants, which may be causally responsible for diseases, and also susceptibility variants, associated with common polygenic diseases. But there is the major problem of penetrance. Thus, there is the question of whether it is worthwhile to perform WGS in all healthy individuals as a step towards Precision Medicine. The genetic architecture of disease is consistent with the fact that they are all polygenic. Moreover, ancestry adds another layer of complexity. We are now capable of obtaining Polygenic Risk Scores for all complex diseases using only data from new generation sequencing. Yet, review of available evidence does not at present favor the idea that WGS analyses are sufficiently developed to allow reliable predictions of the risk components for monogenic and polygenic hereditary diseases in healthy individuals. Probably, it is still better for WGS to remain reserved for the diagnosis of pathogenic variants of Mendelian diseases.

History

Usage metrics

    Genetics and Molecular Biology

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC