figshare
Browse
DOCUMENT
uasa_a_1893179_sm2361.pdf (18.8 MB)
DOCUMENT
uasa_a_1893179_sm2357.docx (16.57 kB)
TEXT
DynamicProgrammingQ_Adam.c (6.46 kB)
.MEXW64
DynamicProgrammingQ_Adam.mexw64 (16.5 kB)
.MAT
EAPM_data.mat (16.65 kB)
.MAT
EAPM_eg2_data.mat (59.73 kB)
TEXT
Empirical_Amplitude_Prior_Model.m (11.05 kB)
DOCUMENT
ReadMe.rtf (50.2 kB)
.MAT
SRAPM_data.mat (17.3 kB)
.MAT
SRAPM_eg2_data.mat (3.68 kB)
.MAT
SRAPM_supplementary_data.mat (1.79 kB)
TEXT
Shape_Restricted_Amplitude_Prior_Model.m (12.14 kB)
TEXT
SqrtMeanInverse.m (1.47 kB)
TEXT
invertGamma.m (0.79 kB)
TEXT
mainWarpingWrapper.m (3.79 kB)
1/0
15 files

Bayesian Framework for Simultaneous Registration and Estimation of Noisy, Sparse, and Fragmented Functional Data

Version 2 2021-03-29, 20:40
Version 1 2021-02-24, 18:10
dataset
posted on 2021-03-29, 20:40 authored by James Matuk, Karthik Bharath, Oksana Chkrebtii, Sebastian Kurtek

In many applications, smooth processes generate data that are recorded under a variety of observational regimes, including dense sampling and sparse or fragmented observations that are often contaminated with error. The statistical goal of registering and estimating the individual underlying functions from discrete observations has thus far been mainly approached sequentially without formal uncertainty propagation, or in an application-specific manner by pooling information across subjects. We propose a unified Bayesian framework for simultaneous registration and estimation, which is flexible enough to accommodate inference on individual functions under general observational regimes. Our ability to do this relies on the specification of strongly informative prior models over the amplitude component of function variability using two strategies: a data-driven approach that defines an empirical basis for the amplitude subspace based on training data, and a shape-restricted approach when the relative location and number of extrema is well-understood. The proposed methods build on the elastic functional data analysis framework to separately model amplitude and phase variability inherent in functional data. We emphasize the importance of uncertainty quantification and visualization of these two components as they provide complementary information about the estimated functions. We validate the proposed framework using multiple simulation studies and real applications.

Funding

This research was partially funded by NSF DMS-1613054, NIH R37-CA214955 (to SK and KB), NSF DMS-2015374 (to KB), and NSF CCF-1740761, NSF DMS-2015226, and NSF CCF-1839252 (to SK).

History