figshare
Browse

On conversational valence and the definition of interjections

Download (202.37 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2025-05-09, 12:22 authored by Alan LibertAlan Libert
Interjections, like some other word classes, have proven difficult to define in a principled way, and therefore there has been disagreement about whether some words belong to this class. Lists of interjections in grammars sometimes include arguably disparate items, e.g. greeting terms, along with words such as oh and ah. There has also been dispute about the possibility or necessity for interjections to be in a syntactic relation to other components, that is, about their valence. In this paper I propose a definition of interjection which involves an extension of valence in the usual syntactic sense, introducing the notion of conversational valence to distinguish between interjections and words such as goodbye. The latter can only be felicitously used when there is an addressee present, as well as the speaker, thus having a conversational valence of 2, while interjections do not require an addressee, i.e. their conversational valence is 1. For example, if I stub my toe I can appropriately say ouch! in the absence of anyone else. Interjections are distinguished by being the only linguistic items with such a low conversational valence.

History

Source title

Proceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference – 2011

Name of conference

42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference

Location

Canberra

Start date

2011-12-01

End date

2011-12-04

Pagination

281-295

Publisher

Australian Linguistic Society

Place published

Canberra

Language

  • en, English

College/Research Centre

Faculty of Education and Arts

School

School of Humanities and Social Science

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC