figshare
Browse

Penal transportation, family history, and convict tourism

Version 2 2025-04-23, 00:32
Version 1 2023-05-24, 05:19
chapter
posted on 2025-04-23, 00:32 authored by Hamish Maxwell-StewartHamish Maxwell-Stewart, L Nicholson
The chapter explores the gap between the lived experience of Australia’s founding convict mothers and fathers and heritage site portrayals of penal transportation. It focuses particularly on Tasmania, formerly known as Van Diemen’s Land—which operated as a British penal colony in the years 1803–1853. We argue that a disproportionate number of convict heritage sites are located in former punishment stations. As such, much of the discourse about convict heritage interpretation has centered on the more brutal end of the system. While the use of punishment as a means of eliciting labor from convict bodies was an important part of convict experience, the measure of pain extracted was disproportionately borne by a few.

Funding

Australian Research Council

Roar Film Pty Ltd

History

Publication title

The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Tourism

Volume

Part F4164

Editors

JZ Wilson, S Hodgkinson, S Piche, and K Walby

Pagination

713-734

ISBN

978-1-137-56134-3

Department/School

Office of the School of Humanities

Publisher

Palgrave Macmillan UK

Publication status

  • Published

Place of publication

London

Extent

48

Rights statement

Copyright 2017 The Editors and The Authors

Socio-economic Objectives

280123 Expanding knowledge in human society

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC