figshare
Browse
erl473001f3_online.jpg (122.16 kB)

(a) Emission pathways and (b) consumptions losses for the reference scenario with weak polices (WeakPol), as well as for stabilization scenarios with a cumulative emissions budget of 2500 GtCO2e, with immediate (immediate) or delayed implementation of comprehensive emissions reductions (Frag2015, Frag2020, Frag2030)

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2013-09-17, 00:00 authored by Gunnar Luderer, Robert C Pietzcker, Christoph Bertram, Elmar Kriegler, Malte Meinshausen, Ottmar Edenhofer

Figure 3. (a) Emission pathways and (b) consumptions losses for the reference scenario with weak polices (WeakPol), as well as for stabilization scenarios with a cumulative emissions budget of 2500 GtCO2e, with immediate (immediate) or delayed implementation of comprehensive emissions reductions (Frag2015, Frag2020, Frag2030).

Abstract

While the international community aims to limit global warming to below 2 ° C to prevent dangerous climate change, little progress has been made towards a global climate agreement to implement the emissions reductions required to reach this target. We use an integrated energy–economy–climate modeling system to examine how a further delay of cooperative action and technology availability affect climate mitigation challenges. With comprehensive emissions reductions starting after 2015 and full technology availability we estimate that maximum 21st century warming may still be limited below 2 ° C with a likely probability and at moderate economic impacts. Achievable temperature targets rise by up to ~0.4 ° C if the implementation of comprehensive climate policies is delayed by another 15 years, chiefly because of transitional economic impacts. If carbon capture and storage (CCS) is unavailable, the lower limit of achievable targets rises by up to ~0.3 ° C. Our results show that progress in international climate negotiations within this decade is imperative to keep the 2 ° C target within reach.

History