Figure_2.tif (1.16 MB)
Schematic paradigm and pupil-size traces for Exp. 1 (a) and Exp. 2 (b).
figure
posted on 2013-10-29, 03:26 authored by Sebastiaan Mathôt, Lotje van der Linden, Jonathan Grainger, Françoise VituPupil size was larger on attend-dark than on attend-bright trials, which reflects attentional modulation of the PLR. This modulation was evident from 717 ms (in Exp 1) and 656 ms (in Exp. 2) after the presentation of the cue, as indicated by the gray shading. In Exp. 1 there was also an overall constriction in response to the (visual) cue, with a mean latency of 241 ms.