figshare
Browse
Table_5.xls (5.5 kB)

Posterior family exceedance probabilities for the typically developing (TD) and reading disability (RD) groups in the visual modality.

Download (0 kB)
dataset
posted on 2013-02-20, 22:43 authored by Li Liu, Amit Vira, Emma Friedman, Jennifer Minas, Donald Bolger, Tali Bitan, James Booth

Note: First step BMS was to test families with different bottom-up modulatory effects. Family 1 = Models with modulatory effects on FG→MTG, but not on FG→IFG. Family 2 = Models with modulatory effects on FG→IFG, but not on FG→MTG. Family 3 = Models with modulatory effects on both bottom-up connections. Family 4 = Models without modulatory effects on either bottom-up connection. Family 3 was the winning family (marked in bold). Second step BMS was to test families with different top-down modulatory effects in family 3 (the winning family). Family A = Models with modulatory effects on IFG→MTG, but not on IFG→FG. Family B = Models with modulatory effects on IFG→FG, but not on IFG→MTG. Family C = Models with modulatory effects on both top-down connections. Family D = Models without modulatory effects on either top-down connection. There was no difference between these families.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC