figshare
Browse
Fig_1.tif (890.79 kB)

Genetic background determines Drosophila response to nicotine.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2015-07-29, 04:26 authored by Iván Sanchez-Díaz, Fernando Rosales-Bravo, José Luis Reyes-Taboada, Alejandra A Covarrubias, Verónica Narvaez-Padilla, Enrique Reynaud

(A) Dose response of w1118 flies to different concentrations of nicotine. The time needed for half of the flies to recover from a given concentration of nicotine exposure is defined as Half Recovery Time (HRT), note that mock exposure of flies (0 ng, closed circles) allows flies to recover nearly immediately. (B) HRTs are shown for different fly genotypes: w1118 and Ore-R are controls, L70 has an insertion located at the 5’ of the miR-310c, F1.1 is a revertant line, where the P-element insertion of L70 line has been precisely excised. L4 line has an insertion in esg. L70 and L4 showed nicotine hypersensitivity. (C) Schematic representation of the L4 P{GawB} insertion. The triangle represents the insertion site according to fly-base standard genome coordinates (release version 6). Zinc fingers are denoted by orange bands, the site of the esg35ce-3 mutation is shown by an arrow. (D) Schematic representation of the L70 P{GawB} insertion. The inverted triangle represents the insertion site according to fly-base standard genome coordinates (release version 6). The arrow shows the miR-310c cistron transcription initiation site. (E) L70 and L4 insertion lines are sensitive to chronic nicotine exposure. Restricted mean lifespan of mutant genotypes are significantly reduced compared to w1118 when maintained in standard cornmeal food, supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml nicotine. All experiments were repeated at least 3 times with an n ≥ 100 flies. * = P≤ 0.01, ** = P≤ 0.001, **** = P<< 0.001, ns = not significant.

History