figshare
Browse
Figure_7.tif (1.72 MB)

Examples of how maternal and gap patterned TFs together give rise to patterned expression.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2010-08-17, 02:01 authored by Majid Kazemian, Charles Blatti, Adam Richards, Michael McCutchan, Noriko Wakabayashi-Ito, Ann S. Hammonds, Susan E. Celniker, Sudhir Kumar, Scot A. Wolfe, Michael H. Brodsky, Saurabh Sinha

Shown are nine sample CRMs, their expression domains (in pink) along the A/P axis (left: anterior), their regulators (as per the predicted regulatory network of Figure 6B), and their respective expression domains (in color code matching that of Figure 6B). Arrows indicate activation and barred lines indicate repressive influence. Repressor domains shown are required to be overlapping with an activator's domain of influence. Solid edges indicate that the regulatory influence is supported by previous experimental evidence in the literature, while dashed edges indicate novel interactions. Labels of TF expression domains are in black or white for better color contrast and have no semantic difference. *The edge between DSTAT and eve_stripe5 is not based on our model predictions (since DSTAT is broadly expressed and was not included in the model) but on the presence of DSTAT binding sites (motif score greater than 4 standard deviations above genomic mean) in the CRM.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS Biology

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC