Figure_3.tif (490.15 kB)
Differences in 5 Hz sAM detection thresholds are not attributable to measures of training or attention.
figure
posted on 2013-02-20, 01:48 authored by Merri J. Rosen, Emma C. Sarro, Jack B. Kelly, Dan H. Sanes(A) Higher sAM detection thresholds in CHLs were not due to better training, as CHLs reached slightly better compentence during training than CTRs, and criterion performance for detection of a fully-modulated sAM did not correlate with sAM detection thresholds for either group. (B) Proficiency with the task during initial testing, measured by d′ levels for fully-modulated sAM, did not explain differences in sAM detection threshold. (C) False alarm rates, a measure of attention, were not different across groups. (D) The number of trials per session, a measure of motivation, also did not explain differences in sAM detection threshold. Black = CTR; Orange = CHL.