figshare
Browse
Figure_5.tif (9.39 MB)

Comparison of the role of Klf9 and Klf11 in an animal endometriosis model.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2013-03-29, 09:44 authored by Gaurang S. Daftary, Ye Zheng, Zaid M. Tabbaa, John K. Schoolmeester, Ravi P. Gada, Adrienne L. Grzenda, Angela J. Mathison, Gary L. Keeney, Gwen A. Lomberk, Raul Urrutia

(A) Endometriotic Lesions (circled) in Klf9-/- animals were either unchanged or had regressed in size from the time of initial peritoneal implantation, when evaluated at necropsy 3 weeks later. (B) Endometriotic lesions in these animals also did not elicit a progressive fibrotic response as seen in Klf11-/- animals. Any adhesions in Klf9-/- animals (black arrow) were flimsy, transparent and peri-lesional in extent. (C) Tissue planes were unaltered with preservation of intra-abdominal anatomy. Consequently, intestinal length was not foreshortened due to lack of mesenteric fibrosis (unraveled intestinal loops denoted by white arrows). (D): A composite adhesion score for each mouse was determined and compared between Klf11-/-, Klf9-/- and wildtype genotypes, based on the Murine Adhesion Scoring System. The adhesion score for Klf11-/- mice (81.7±4.8) was significantly different from that calculated in either Klf9-/- (12.3±1.8) or wildtype animals (9.17±0.8); (* = p<0.05, 14 lesions/genotype). The scores objectively reflected observed anatomical findings in these animals.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC