figshare
Browse
Fig_3.tif (536.38 kB)

Comparison of numerical results from temporal Gillespie and rejection sampling algorithms.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2015-10-30, 03:54 authored by Christian L. Vestergaard, Mathieu Génois

(A) Mean number of nodes in each state of the SIR model as function of time. (B) Distribution of final epidemic sizes (number of recovered nodes when I = 0) in the SIR model. (C) Mean number of nodes in each state of the SIS model as function of time. (D) Distribution of the number of infected nodes in the stationary state (t → ∞) of the SIS model. All simulations were performed 1 000 000 times with the root node chosen at random on an activity driven network [41] consisting of N = 100 nodes, with activities ai = ηzi, where η = 0.1 and zizi-3.2 for zi ∈ [0.03, 1), and a node formed two contacts when active. Parameters of the epidemic processes were βΔt = 10−2 and μΔt = 10−4.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS Computational Biology

    Categories

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC