figshare
Browse
Table_2.xls (5.5 kB)

Analysis of the results presented in Fig 2.

Download (0 kB)
dataset
posted on 2015-05-20, 03:02 authored by Timothée Poisot, Sonia Kéfi, Serge Morand, Michal Stanko, Pablo A. Marquet, Michael E. Hochberg

Metrics in bold are significantly different from chance expectation. S: average specificity. NODF: nestedness. Q: modularity. Co: connectance.

We used a two-sample t-test to determine differences from chance expectations for networks with either less, equal, or more strategy diversity. We observe that all metrics are different from chance expectations for parasitism networks, but not for other interaction types (although our failure to report an effect is most likely due to the small sample size, as indicated by certain large confidence intervals).

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC