jp5b01324_si_001.pdf (15.84 MB)
Surface Morphology of Cu Adsorption on Different Terminations of the Hägg Iron Carbide (χ-Fe5C2) Phase
journal contribution
posted on 2015-04-02, 00:00 authored by Xinxin Tian, Tao Wang, Yong Yang, Yong-Wang Li, Jianguo Wang, Haijun JiaoSpin-polarized density functional
theory computations have been
carried out to investigate the surface morphology of Cun adsorption on the Fe5C2(100),
Fe5C2(111), Fe5C2(510),
Fe5C2(001), and Fe5C2(010)
surface terminations in different surface Fe and C ratios. On the
Fe5C2(100), and Fe5C2(510)
surfaces, aggregation is thermodynamically more favored than dispersion,
while dispersion is more favored than aggregation on the Fe5C2(111) surface for n = 2–4, on
the Fe5C2(010) surface for n = 2 and on the Fe5C2(001) surface for n = 2–4. The difference in structures and stability
at low coverage depends on the stronger Cu–Fe interaction over
the Cu–Cu interaction as well as the location of the adsorption
sites. The adsorption energies do not correlate with the surface Fe
and C ratios. Comparison among the most stable Fe(110), Fe3C(001), and Fe5C2(100) surfaces reveals that
the Fe(110) surface has higher Cu affinity than the Fe3C(001) and Fe5C2(100) surfaces; and the carbide
surfaces have close Cu affinities; in agreement with the experimental
observations. On all these iron and carbide surfaces, two-dimensional
monolayer surface adsorption configurations are energetically more
favored than the adsorption of three-dimensional Cun clusters, and it can be expected that the adsorbed Cu atoms
should grow epitaxially as a layer-by-layer mode at the initial stage.
On the metallic Fe(110), Fe(100), Fe(111), and Fe3C(010)
surfaces, the adsorbed Cu atoms are negatively charged; while on the
Fe3C(100), Fe5C2(100), Fe5C2(111), Fe5C2(010), and Fe5C2(001) surfaces, the adsorbed Cu atoms are positively
charged. On the Fe3C(001) and Fe5C2(510) surfaces, the adsorbed Cu atoms mainly interacting with surface
Fe atoms are very slightly negatively charged. This trend is in line
with their difference in electronegativity. Our results build the
foundation for further study of the Cu-promotion effect in Fe-based
FTS in particular and for metal-doped heterogeneous catalysis in general.