448734_sm1A.tif (3.04 MB)View fileThis item contains files with download restrictions
IMAGE
448734_sm1B.tif (3.26 MB)View fileThis item contains files with download restrictions
IMAGE
448734_sm1C.tif (3.51 MB)View fileThis item contains files with download restrictions
IMAGE
448734_sm2A.tif (14.23 MB)View fileThis item contains files with download restrictions
IMAGE
448734_sm2B.tif (6.16 MB)View fileThis item contains files with download restrictions
IMAGE
448734_sm3A.tif (979.29 kB)View fileThis item contains files with download restrictions
IMAGE
448734_sm3B.tif (916.88 kB)View fileThis item contains files with download restrictions
IMAGE
448734_sm3C.tif (903.42 kB)View fileThis item contains files with download restrictions
Next page
Previous page
1/1
Switch ViewSwitch between different file views
Thumbnail viewList viewFile view
9 filesFullscreen
Supplementary Material for: Antiangiogenic Therapy Induces Hepatic Tumor Vascular Network Rearrangement to Receive Perfusion via the Portal Vein and Hepatic Artery
posted on 2016-09-20, 09:28authored byKang W., Lim J.S., Park M.-S., Koh G.Y., Kim H.
Purpose: Hepatic malignancies can easily develop resistance to antiangiogenic therapy, but the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. This study explores whether antiangiogenic therapy influences the tumor vascular network and/or the vessels feeding the hepatic tumor. Methods: Mice implanted with Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells were subcutaneously injected 3 times (once every other day starting 1 week after LLC implantation) with either an antiangiogenic agent [vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-Trap] or control agent (bovine serum albumin) at a dose of 25 mg/kg before performing angiography. Hepatic arteriography and portography were performed using a vascular cast method with vascular latex. Results: Arteriography of the control-treated LLC-implanted mice showed marked staining of the mass with a prominent feeding artery, suggesting that the tumor is supplied by arterial perfusion. No significant staining was observed on portography. By contrast, 33% (n = 3/9) of the LLC-implanted mice treated with the antiangiogenic agent VEGF-Trap showed intratumoral staining during portography, indicating that these tumors received perfusion via the portal vein. Conclusion:Antiangiogenic treatment can induce rearrangement of the hepatic tumor vascular network to establish communication with the portal vein. This implies that hepatic tumors can develop resistance to antiangiogenic therapy by maintaining perfusion through portal venous perfusion.