Supplemental Information for MMETSP article: 'Re-assembly, quality evaluation, and annotation of 678 microbial eukaryotic reference transcriptomes'
2018-09-14T22:40:46Z (GMT) by
Supplemental Information for the MMETSP article, 'Re-assembly, quality evaluation, and annotation of 678 microbial eukaryotic reference transcriptomes'
Supplemental Table 1: All evaluation metrics collected for Johnson et al. 2018 (MMETSP_all_evaluation_matrix.csv)
Supplemental Table 2: Metadata for Supplemental Table 1 (MMETSP_all_evaluation_matrix_METADATA.csv)
Supplemental Notebook 1: comparison between NCBI SRA and iMicrobe sample information (.ipynb, .html)
Supplemental Notebook 2: Trinity version comparisons (.ipyn, .html)
Supplemental Figure 1: Transrate score comparisons between DIB re-assemblies and the two 'cds' and 'nt' versions of the NCGR assemblies (.pdf)
Supplemental Figure 2: Frequency distribution of differences between Transrate scores between the NCGR ‘nt’ assemblies and the DIB re-assemblies grouped by the top seven most represented phyla in the MMETSP data set (.pdf)
Supplemental Figure 3: The mean proportion of contigs with complete protistan universal single copy orthologs (BUSCO) recovered in each assembly (.pdf)
Supplemental Figure 4: A subset of MMETSP samples. (.pdf and .ipynb)
Other notebooks (all .html) used to generate Figures for Johnson et al 2018:
Figures 4 and 7 - MMETSP_unique_kmers_dammitgenenames.ipynb
Files located on GitHub: