figshare
Browse
Quantum Computing.pdf (2.3 MB)

On the P versus NP Problem and the Myth of Scalable Quantum Computing

Download (19.36 MB)
Version 22 2017-09-23, 07:53
Version 21 2017-09-22, 20:09
Version 20 2017-09-22, 19:56
Version 19 2017-09-22, 18:56
Version 18 2017-09-22, 15:48
Version 17 2017-08-07, 12:14
Version 16 2017-08-07, 11:53
Version 15 2017-08-07, 11:50
Version 14 2017-08-06, 11:00
Version 13 2017-07-31, 09:58
Version 12 2017-07-30, 05:56
Version 11 2017-07-29, 01:38
Version 10 2017-07-29, 01:36
Version 9 2017-07-29, 01:28
Version 8 2017-07-29, 00:42
Version 7 2017-07-29, 00:38
Version 6 2017-07-28, 23:15
Version 5 2017-07-28, 17:42
Version 4 2017-07-28, 17:21
Version 3 2017-07-28, 16:21
journal contribution
posted on 2017-09-23, 07:53 authored by John SmithJohn Smith
The prospect of an up-coming quantum computer revolution is big news these days, with some technologists predicting that a scalable quantum computer is a mere 4 - 5 years away. It has even been claimed -by D-Wave cofounder Eric Ladizinsky- that this prospective revolution will be civilization's next big revolution. I think that quantum computers that are anything more than toys are, not merely difficult to engineer, but mathematically impossible, and based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship between classical and quantum physics. An argument to this conclusion is presented here, with reference to the P versus NP problem.

History