figshare
Browse
rsif20170202_si_002.doc (1.85 MB)

Appendix 2: in silico (B) vs in vivo 3D distance plots aligned in the Frankfort plane from Modelling human skull growth: a validated computational model

Download (1.85 MB)
Version 2 2020-10-15, 09:16
Version 1 2017-05-17, 08:33
journal contribution
posted on 2017-05-17, 08:33 authored by Joseph Libby, Arsalan Marghoub, David Johnson, Roman H. Khonsari, Michael J. Fagan, Mehran Moazen
n silico (B) vs. in vivo 3D distance plots – Frankfort plane alignment: The scaling polarity used here was the same as that used in Figure 6. The blue areas on the plots highlight where the in silico (B) model under-predicted the in vivo CT data and the red areas indicate where the in silico (B) skull over-predicted the geometry of the in vivo CT data. Each skull has been scaled individually with the max and min values for the colour chart displayed below each age.

History

Usage metrics

    Journal of the Royal Society Interface

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC