figshare
Browse
uasa_a_1323641_sm0561.pdf (337.54 kB)

Analyzing Two-Stage Experiments in the Presence of Interference

Download (337.54 kB)
Version 2 2018-05-16, 20:53
Version 1 2017-06-26, 16:04
journal contribution
posted on 2018-05-16, 20:53 authored by Guillaume Basse, Avi Feller

Two-stage randomization is a powerful design for estimating treatment effects in the presence of interference; that is, when one individual’s treatment assignment affects another individual’s outcomes. Our motivating example is a two-stage randomized trial evaluating an intervention to reduce student absenteeism in the School District of Philadelphia. In that experiment, households with multiple students were first assigned to treatment or control; then, in treated households, one student was randomly assigned to treatment. Using this example, we highlight key considerations for analyzing two-stage experiments in practice. Our first contribution is to address additional complexities that arise when household sizes vary; in this case, researchers must decide between assigning equal weight to households or equal weight to individuals. We propose unbiased estimators for a broad class of individual- and household-weighted estimands, with corresponding theoretical and estimated variances. Our second contribution is to connect two common approaches for analyzing two-stage designs: linear regression and randomization inference. We show that, with suitably chosen standard errors, these two approaches yield identical point and variance estimates, which is somewhat surprising given the complex randomization scheme. Finally, we explore options for incorporating covariates to improve precision. We confirm our analytic results via simulation studies and apply these methods to the attendance study, finding substantively meaningful spillover effects.

History

Usage metrics

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC