figshare
Browse
41747_2018_64_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (578.7 kB)

Additional file 2: of Emphysema quantification using chest CT: influence of radiation dose reduction and reconstruction technique

Download (578.7 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-11-07, 05:00 authored by Annemarie den Harder, Erwin de Boer, Suzanne Lagerweij, Martijn Boomsma, Arnold Schilham, Martin Willemink, Julien Milles, Tim Leiner, Ricardo Budde, Pim de Jong
Figure S1. Bland–Altman plots for the differences in percentage emphysema when comparing the optimal adapted threshold at each dose level to FBP at routine dose using a − 950 HU threshold. The continuous line represents the mean difference to the reference standard while the dotted lines represent the upper and lower limits of agreement (95% limits of agreement). FBP filtered back projection, HIR hybrid iterative reconstruction; MIR model-based iterative reconstruction. Figure S2. Bland–Altman plots for the differences in HU value when comparing the optimal adapted threshold at each dose level with FBP at routine dose using the perc15 method. The continuous line represents the mean difference to the reference standard while the dotted lines represent the upper and lower limits of agreement (95% limits of agreement). FBP filtered back projection; HIR hybrid iterative reconstruction; MIR model-based iterative reconstruction. (PDF 578 kb)

History