figshare
Browse
40170_2016_152_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (337.59 kB)

Additional file 2: Table S1. of Metabolic clusters of breast cancer in relation to gene- and protein expression subtypes

Download (337.59 kB)
dataset
posted on 2016-06-27, 05:00 authored by Tonje Haukaas, Leslie Euceda, Guro Giskeødegård, Santosh Lamichhane, Marit Krohn, Sandra Jernström, Miriam Aure, Ole Lingjærde, Ellen Schlichting, Øystein Garred, Eldri Due, Gordon Mills, Kristine Sahlberg, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Tone Bathen
Antibodies used for reverse phase protein array (RPPA). Table S2. Metabolite integrals for each of the samples included in the study. Table S3. Significantly different expressed genes between the three metabolic clusters. Table S4. Significantly different expressed genes between the metabolic clusters Mc1 and Mc2. Table S5. Significantly different expressed genes between the metabolic clusters Mc1 and Mc3. Table 6. Statistically over-represented annotation terms, according to DAVID, of differently expressed genes between metabolic cluster Mc1 and Mc2. Table S7. Statistically over-represented annotation terms, according to DAVID, of differently expressed genes between metabolic cluster Mc1 and Mc3. Table S8. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) result for gene ontology (GO) gene sets. Metabolic cluster Mc1 was compared with Mc2 and Mc3. Table S9. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) result for gene ontology (GO) gene sets. Metabolic cluster Mc1 was compared with Mc2. Table S10. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) result for gene ontology (GO) gene sets. Metabolic cluster Mc3 was compared with Mc1 and Mc2. Table S11. Integrated pathway analysis result from the comparison of the metabolic clusters Mc1 compared to Mc2. Table S12. Integrated pathway analysis result from the comparison of the metabolic clusters Mc1 compared to Mc3. (XLSX 337 kb)

Funding

Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen

History