Additional file 1: of Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial

Gude, Wouter; Roos-Blom, Marie-José; van der Veer, Sabine; de Jonge, Evert; Peek, Niels; Dongelmans, Dave; de Keizer, Nicolette

doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3788521_D1.v1

13012_2017_594_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18.74 kB)

Additional file 1: of Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial

journal contribution

posted on 2017-05-25, 05:00 authored by Wouter Gude, Marie-José Roos-Blom, Sabine van der Veer, Evert de Jonge, Niels Peek, Dave Dongelmans, Nicolette de Keizer

Summary of our intervention design by comparing it against Brehaut et al.’s [45] recent list of 15 A&F design suggestions. Note that the term “action” in Brehaut et al.’s table refers to the clinical feedback topic (i.e. indicators) whereas in this study we use “action” to indicate behaviour in response to receiving feedback. (DOCX 18 kb)