figshare
Browse
12870_2017_1178_MOESM14_ESM.pdf (1.04 MB)

Additional file 14: Figure S8. of A comparative analysis of nonhost resistance across the two Triticeae crop species wheat and barley

Download (1.04 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-12-04, 05:00 authored by Rhoda Delventhal, Jeyaraman Rajaraman, Francesca Stefanato, Sajid Rehman, Reza Aghnoum, Graham McGrann, Marie Bolger, BjĂśrn Usadel, Pete Hedley, Lesley Boyd, Rients Niks, Patrick Schweizer, Ulrich Schaffrath
Clusterings of Puccinia microarray data leading to the decision to exclude one of three biological barley replicates. Ideally, the replications (1, 2, 3) from the same treatment (mock, host, nonhost) and time point (12, 24, 36 and 48 hpi) should cluster together. The clustering of chips was very clear in case of wheat/Puccinia interaction (a). In case of barley/Puccinia this was not the case: 7 out of 12 chips from replication 1 did not cluster into their respective subclades (b) (coloured arrows indicate chips out of their respective clusters). Therefore the complete replication 1 of barley/Puccinia interactions was omitted from the final analysis, resulting in a great enrichment of host/nonhost differentially regulated genes (11 according to analysis with all 3 replicates, 1824 according to analysis without replicate 1). (PDF 1063 kb)

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

History