%0 Figure %A T. Elfes, Cristiane %A Longo, Catherine %A S. Halpern, Benjamin %A Hardy, Darren %A Scarborough, Courtney %A D. Best, Benjamin %A Pinheiro, Tiago %A F. Dutra, Guilherme %D 2014 %T Goal and sub-goal scores for Brazil regional analysis (left), and Brazil global analysis (right). %U https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Goal_and_sub_goal_scores_for_Brazil_regional_analysis_left_and_Brazil_global_analysis_right_/984341 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0092589.g005 %2 https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1446582 %K Computational biology %K Ecosystem modeling %K ecology %K Ecological metrics %K Extinction risk %K ecosystems %K ecosystem functioning %K biodiversity %K Coastal ecology %K Marine ecology %K Evolutionary biology %K Evolutionary processes %K Species extinction %K Marine biology %K Fisheries science %K Marine conservation %K Marine monitoring %K Bioindicators %K Conservation science %K Environmental protection %K Science education %K Science policy and economics %K Economics %K Sociology %K demography %K Social research %K sub-goal %K scores %K brazil %X

Key differences are found in Artisanal Fishing Opportunities, Tourism and Recreation, Lasting Special Places and Iconic Species. Overall Index scores (center) for the regional study are remarkably similar to global results for Brazil.

%I PLOS ONE