TY - DATA T1 - Table_1_The Modified Stroop Task Is Susceptible to Feigning: Stroop Performance and Symptom Over-endorsement in Feigned Test Anxiety.DOCX PY - 2018/07/11 AU - Irena Boskovic AU - Anita J. Biermans AU - Thomas Merten AU - Marko Jelicic AU - Lorraine Hope AU - Harald Merckelbach UR - https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_The_Modified_Stroop_Task_Is_Susceptible_to_Feigning_Stroop_Performance_and_Symptom_Over-endorsement_in_Feigned_Test_Anxiety_DOCX/6803495 DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01195.s001 L4 - https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12373997 KW - feigning KW - over-reporting KW - test anxiety KW - SRSI KW - modified Stroop task N2 - Some researchers argue that the modified Stroop task (MST) can be employed to rule out feigning. According to these authors, modified Stroop interference effects are beyond conscious control and therefore indicative of genuine psychopathology. We examined this assumption using a within-subject design. In the first session, students (N = 22) responded honestly, while in the second session they were asked to read a vignette about test anxiety and then fake this condition. During both sessions, we administered an MST consisting of neutral, anxiety-related, and test anxiety-related words. Participants also completed the Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI; Merten et al., 2016) that focuses on over-reporting of pseudosymptoms. Our feigning instructions were successful in that students succeeded in generating the typical MST effect by providing longer response latencies on anxiety related (r = 0.43) and test anxiety-related (r = 0.31) words, compared with neutral words. Furthermore, students endorsed significantly more pseudosymptoms on the SRSI (r = 0.62) in the feigning session than in the honest control condition. We conclude that the MST effect is not immune to feigning tendencies, while the SRSI provides promising results that require future research. ER -