%0 Figure %A Yang, Xing %A Guo, Aike %D 2013 %T The location effect of a black bar on the fixation performance of WTB flies. %U https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_The_location_effect_of_a_black_bar_on_the_fixation_performance_of_WTB_flies_/678415 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0061313.g007 %2 https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1019281 %K Evolutionary biology %K Animal behavior %K Behavioral ecology %K Model organisms %K Animal models %K Drosophila melanogaster %K neuroscience %K Cognitive neuroscience %K Motor reactions %K Positioning reactions %K Sensory systems %K Visual system %K Behavioral neuroscience %K Learning and memory %K Zoology %K fixation %K wtb %X

(A) The MED had a significant location dependence (p = 1.4509×10−9). The best location for black bar fixation was 10° below the flies. (B) The fixation performance at 2 locations (−10°; 30°) was selected to show more details of the dwelling time in the whole panorama. Note the sharp peak in the dwelling time in the central quadrant (−45∼+45° area around the bar in the panorama) at the location θ = −10°; the distribution of dwelling time was quite even at the location θ = 30°. (C) Obvious location dependence in the rDTabs between the central quadrant and the rest area (p = 1.1145×10−8). (D) There was no obvious location dependence in the rDFS between the central quadrant and the rest area (p = 0.7273). These differences were quite small. The data in (A&B) are given as the mean±SEM; the data in (C&D) are shown by box plot; the red crosses represent outliers; the p values were calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test; the y-axes of certain charts are truncated for compactness.

%I PLOS ONE