%0 Figure %A Sanz, Hector %A J. Aponte, John %A Harezlak, Jaroslaw %A Dong, Yan %A Ayestaran, Aintzane %A Nhabomba, Augusto %A Mpina, Maxmillian %A Maurin, Obiang Régis %A Díez-Padrisa, Núria %A Aguilar, Ruth %A Moncunill, Gemma %A Todagbe, Agnandij Selidji %A Daubenberger, Claudia %A Dobaño, Carlota %A Valim, Clarissa %D 2017 %T Cartoon showing the influence of the Subtract method into the standard samples. %U https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/Cartoon_showing_the_influence_of_the_Subtract_method_into_the_standard_samples_/5600683 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0187901.g001 %2 https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9748957 %K quality control %K Suboptimal calibration %K fitness %K RTS %K method %K malaria %K vaccine %K multiplex bead-based immunoassays data analysis Multiplex bead-based immunoassays %K background noise %K multiplex bead-based immunoassay %K estimation %K function %K SC %K Phase 3 randomized %K sample %K quantification %K analyte %K concentration %K drLumi %K conduct quality control %X

Background noise calculated as the geometric mean of the blank controls is shown as a horizontal dashed line. (A) Standard curve plotting the MFI in the original scale as a function of concentration; (B) Standard curve plotting the MFI in the original scale as a function of concentration after subtracting the MFI of the blank control from all standard samples; (C) Standard curve plotting the MFI in the log10 scale as a function of concentration; and (D) Standard curve plotting the MFI in the log10 scale as a function of concentration after subtracting the MFI of the blank control from all standard samples.

%I PLOS ONE