%0 Generic %A Dimitriadis, Zisis %A Scholtz, Werner %A Ensminger, Stephan M. %A Piper, Cornelia %A Bitter, Thomas %A Wiemer, Marcus %A Vlachojannis, Marios %A Börgermann, Jochen %A Faber, Lothar %A Horstkotte, Dieter %A Gummert, Jan %A Scholtz, Smita %D 2017 %T Complications compared between each group. %U https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Complications_compared_between_each_group_/5343436 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0183658.t004 %2 https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9178327 %K mortality %K Results G 1 %K transfemoral TAVI approaches %K sheath diameter %K BMI %K Kaplan Meier analysis %K complication %K CI %K 18 F Medtronic Sentrant %K Proglide closure device Objective Evaluation %K transfemoral aortic valve implantation %K 18 F %X

The first part of the table presents the individual complications, and the second part the complications is grouped according to the VARC-II classification. Variables are expressed as percentage (number).

%I PLOS ONE