TY - DATA T1 - Estimation of the body surface area and its impact on the heat transfer by convection in sheep: A computational way PY - 2017/08/08 AU - Bruno Rodrigo Simão AU - Alex Sandro Campos Maia AU - Patric André Castro AU - Gustavo André Bernado Moura AU - Vinicius de França Carvalho Fonsêca UR - https://cbbiomet.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Estimation_of_the_body_surface_area_and_its_impact_on_the_heat_transfer_by_convection_in_sheep_A_computational_way/5176492 DO - 10.6084/m9.figshare.5176492.v1 L4 - https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9052912 KW - 3D animal scanning KW - Photogrammetry KW - Animal body measurement KW - Environmental Management N2 - : The aim of this work it was to validate the 3D modeling to obtain the body surface area of animals, and determine the impact on the rate of heat transfer by convection in Corriedale sheep when include legs and head in the standard cylindrical model. Five shorn Corriedale sheep weighing between 29 and 105 kg (two breeders, one young male and two young females) were used. A regression equation, standard cylindrical model, hand instrument and 3D modeling were used to obtain surface area. Data were analyzed by least-squares methods and a non-linear regression was applied with geometric adjust in a power function. Pearson correlation was tested. Coefficients were highly significant (p<0.01). Body surface area and weight presented high (r = 0.99) correlation. From the power function (allometric equation) adjusted in the regression equation, the coefficient “b” assumed the following values 0.5025, 0.6122 and 0.6391 and the coefficient “a” 0.171, 0.1117 and 0.1045 for Bennett’s equation, 3D modeling’s and instrument’s equation, respectively. Coefficients differences between the present investigation and Bennett’s work can be explained by the intraspecific relationship and range of body weight considered, once he used Merino sheep from 23 to 63 kg and we worked with corriedale sheep from 29 to 105 kg. Considering an animal of 63 kg, Bennet’s equation presented an underestimate value to the body surface area over the 7.3 % and 8 % when compared with hand instrument’s and 3D Model’s, respectively. Furthermore, this error increases at least 3% if we considered a 100 Kg Corriedale sheep. At this condition, 3D model with hand instrument presented less than 1% of the difference. The use of simple horizontal cylinder causes an underestimated on the rate of heat flow by convection because legs and head can represent 35 %, on average, of the total body surface area in a Corriedale sheep of 100 Kg. Thus, 3D modelling seems to be the best way to obtain the animal surface area, and certainly, appears as a tool to improve research involving heat and mass transfer and animal breeding. ER -