Mean F<sub>0</sub> in responses the three targets. Juan David Leongómez Viktoria R. Mileva Anthony C. Little S. Craig Roberts 10.1371/journal.pone.0179407.g003 https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/Mean_F_sub_0_sub_in_responses_the_three_targets_/5109205 <p>Mean F<sub>0</sub> estimated for participants with varying degrees of dominance (Low dominance = 10<sup>th</sup> percentile; High dominance = 90% percentile. Neutral target: white bars; dominant target: light grey bars; prestigious target: dark grey bars. † represents a main effect of target. For panned contrasts (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0179407#pone.0179407.t003" target="_blank">Table 3</a>), shapes above the bars represent a significant difference between responses to neutral versus high-status targets (dominant and prestigious). *<i>p</i> < .05, **<i>p</i> < .01. Bars represent estimated marginal means ± 1 s.e.m. Straight lines represent linear regressions for responses to each type of target, from which marginal means are estimated (neutral: dotted line; dominant: dashed line; prestigious: solid line). In all cases, F<sub>0</sub> values were standardised (to z scores) for each participant to make results equivalent and account for between-subject differences.</p> 2017-06-14 17:46:08 high-status targets characteristics Non-verbal behaviours individual Self-perceived prestige speaker parameter dominance F 0 modulation interview questions participants Perceived differences response listener job interviews within-subject differences voice characteristics