TY - DATA T1 - Supplementary Material for: An Analytic Solution to the Computation of Power and Sample Size for Genetic Association Studies under a Pleiotropic Mode of Inheritance PY - 2017/03/17 AU - Gordon D. AU - Londono D. AU - Patel P. AU - Kim W. AU - Finch S.J. AU - Heiman G.A. UR - https://karger.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Supplementary_Material_for_An_Analytic_Solution_to_the_Computation_of_Power_and_Sample_Size_for_Genetic_Association_Studies_under_a_Pleiotropic_Mode_of_Inheritance/4763455 DO - 10.6084/m9.figshare.4763455.v1 L4 - https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/7817236 KW - Pleiotropy KW - Multiple phenotypes KW - Genome-wide association study KW - Noncentrality parameter KW - Statistics KW - Method N2 - Our motivation here is to calculate the power of 3 statistical tests used when there are genetic traits that operate under a pleiotropic mode of inheritance and when qualitative phenotypes are defined by use of thresholds for the multiple quantitative phenotypes. Specifically, we formulate a multivariate function that provides the probability that an individual has a vector of specific quantitative trait values conditional on having a risk locus genotype, and we apply thresholds to define qualitative phenotypes (affected, unaffected) and compute penetrances and conditional genotype frequencies based on the multivariate function. We extend the analytic power and minimum-sample-size-necessary (MSSN) formulas for 2 categorical data-based tests (genotype, linear trend test [LTT]) of genetic association to the pleiotropic model. We further compare the MSSN of the genotype test and the LTT with that of a multivariate ANOVA (Pillai). We approximate the MSSN for statistics by linear models using a factorial design and ANOVA. With ANOVA decomposition, we determine which factors most significantly change the power/MSSN for all statistics. Finally, we determine which test statistics have the smallest MSSN. In this work, MSSN calculations are for 2 traits (bivariate distributions) only (for illustrative purposes). We note that the calculations may be extended to address any number of traits. Our key findings are that the genotype test usually has lower MSSN requirements than the LTT. More inclusive thresholds (top/bottom 25% vs. top/bottom 10%) have higher sample size requirements. The Pillai test has a much larger MSSN than both the genotype test and the LTT, as a result of sample selection. With these formulas, researchers can specify how many subjects they must collect to localize genes for pleiotropic phenotypes. ER -