10.1371/journal.pone.0017227.g001
Wendy E. Morrison
Wendy
E. Morrison
Mark E. Hay
Mark E.
Hay
Consumption (mean ±1SE) of confamilial pairs of native vs exotic
macrophytes by five herbivore species: (a) <i>P. spiculifer</i>,
(b) <i>P. canaliculata</i>, (c) <i>P. insularum</i>, (d)
<i>P. haustrum</i>, and (e) <i>P.
paludosa</i>.
Public Library of Science
2013
confamilial
pairs
exotic
macrophytes
herbivore
2013-02-20 20:08:25
Figure
https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Consumption_mean_1SE_of_confamilial_pairs_of_native_vs_exotic____macrophytes_by_five_herbivore_species_a_P_spiculifer____b_P_canaliculata_c_P_insularum_d____P_haustrum_and_e_P____paludosa_/464166
<p>The sloping line in each figure represents the 50∶50 distribution
expected if there is no preference for native versus exotic plants. The
filled-in symbols indicate significant preference for one plant in that
pair. Inset histograms show the mean consumption across exotic and native
plant pairings. P-values from two-tailed paired T-tests are for the pooled
histogram data. The triangles present in a) and e) represent comparisons
including <i>Ludwigia grandiflora</i> and <i>Pistia
stratiotes</i>, plants whose native distribution is in question.
P-values for these two graphs are provided with (N = 9)
and without (N = 7) these two data points. The a and
b's designate comparisons from the North American and South American
perspective, respectively.</p>