Additional file 1: Table S1. of How and how much does RAD-seq bias genetic diversity estimates? Marie Cariou Laurent Duret Sylvain Charlat 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3615161_D1.v1 https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Additional_file_1_Table_S1_of_How_and_how_much_does_RAD-seq_bias_genetic_diversity_estimates_/4375670 Genomic sequences used for the in silico RAD-seq experiments. 2. Polymorphism heterogeneity along the genome of Schizophyllum commune. Figure S1. Theoretical and observed distributions of genetic distances (number of SNPs between RAD tags) between two American S. commune individuals (A10 and A13, on the left) and between 2 Russian individuals (K1 and K3, on the right). Blue: observed distribution of genetic distances; red: Poisson distribution, expected under a model of homogeneous polymorphism along the genome. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, D = 0.2404, p-value < 2.2e-16 and D = 0.3881, p-value < 2.2e-16. Figure S2. Observed distributions of genetic distances (number of SNPs between RAD tags) between 2 American S. commune individuals (A10 and A13) and 2 Russian individuals (K1 and K3). Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, D = 0.2916, p-value < 2.2e-16. The figure shows that the distribution of RAD distances is more heterogeneous in the Russian population. 3. Examples of command lines for ms and seq-gen. (DOC 378 kb) 2016-11-08 05:00:00 Population genomics Reduced representation genomics Allele drop-out ABC Non-neutral model Population structure