TY - DATA T1 - Details regarding the meta-analysis of home range size in ungulates from Home ranges, habitat and body mass: simple correlates of home range size in ungulates PY - 2016/12/12 AU - Endre Grüner Ofstad AU - Ivar Herfindal AU - Erling Johan Solberg AU - Bernt-Erik Sæther UR - https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Details_regarding_the_meta-analysis_of_home_range_size_in_ungulates_from_Home_ranges_habitat_and_body_mass_simple_correlates_of_home_range_size_in_ungulates/4308968 DO - 10.6084/m9.figshare.4308968.v1 L4 - https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/7026797 KW - allometry KW - comparative analyses KW - diet KW - group size KW - habitat KW - landscape effects KW - mating system KW - space use KW - ungulate N2 - The spatial scale of animal space use, e.g. measured as individual home range size, is a key trait with important implications for ecological and evolutionary processes as well as management and conservation of populations and ecosystems. Explaining variation in home range size has therefore received great attention in ecological research. However, few studies have examined multiple hypotheses simultaneously, which is important provided the complex interactions between life history, social system and behaviour. Here, we review previous studies on home range size in ungulates, supplementing with a meta-analysis, to assess how differences in habitat use and species characteristics affect the relationship between body mass and home range size. Habitat type was the main factor explaining interspecific differences in home range size after accounting for species body mass and group size. Species using open habitats had larger home ranges for a given body mass than species using closed habitats, whereas species in open landscapes showed a much weaker allometric relationship compared with species living in closed landscapes. We found no support for relationships between home range size and species diet or mating system, or any sexual differences. These patterns suggest that the spatial scale of animal movement mainly is a combined effect of body mass, group size and the landscape structure. Accordingly, landscape management must acknowledge the influence of spatial distribution of habitat types on animal behaviour to ensure natural processes affecting demography and viability of ungulate populations. ER -