10.6084/m9.figshare.4229492.v1 Sara M. Clifton Sara M. Clifton Rosemary I. Braun Rosemary I. Braun Daniel M. Abrams Daniel M. Abrams Supplemental figures, tables, and discussion to accompany “Handicap principle implies emergence of dimorphic ornaments” The Royal Society 2016 ornament evolution natural selection sexual selection competition handicap principle 2016-11-12 07:10:14 Journal contribution https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Supplemental_figures_tables_and_discussion_to_accompany_Handicap_principle_implies_emergence_of_dimorphic_ornaments_/4229492 8 supplemental figures, 2 supplemental tables, and 11 supplemental sections to accompany "Handicap principle implies emergence of dimorphic ornaments"; Figure S1: Probability density function; Figure S2: Example potential functions; Figure S3: Perturbation calculation; Figure S4: Comparison of Hartigans' dip test and our bootstrap dip test; Figure S5: Additional ornament data sets (birds); Figure S6: Additional ornament data sets; Figure S7: Bimodal body size data sets; Figure S8: Bimodal forest data sets; Table I: Dip test results; Table II: Gaussian mixture model fit results; Section I: The connection between potential and fitness; Section II: Fixed points for general class of potential functions with minimum of 2 morphs; Section III: Fixed points for general class of potential functions with maximum of 2 morphs; Section IV: Continuum limit; Section V: Eigenvalues of system as N to infinity; Section VI: Alternative multiplicative form for potential; Section VII: Mechanisms for bimodality; Section VIII: Applicability of model; Section IX:; Statistical analysis of ornamentation data; Section X: Additional Data and Analysis; Section XI: Connection to speciation models