TY - DATA T1 - Paper II.Supp.Tables-3&4.xls from Mutation rate analysis via parent–progeny sequencing of the perennial peach II: no evidence for recombination-associated mutation PY - 2016/10/12 AU - Long Wang AU - Yanchun Zhang AU - Chao Qin AU - Dacheng Tian AU - Sihai Yang AU - Laurence D. Hurst UR - https://rs.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Paper_II_Supp_Tables-3_4_xls_from_Mutation_rate_analysis_via_parent_progeny_sequencing_of_the_perennial_peach_II_no_evidence_for_recombination-associated_mutation/4009947 DO - 10.6084/m9.figshare.4009947.v1 L4 - https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6453048 KW - peach KW - mutation rate KW - crossover rate KW - domestication N2 - Mutation rates and recombination rates vary between species and between regions within a genome. What are the determinants of these forms of variation? Prior evidence has suggested that the recombination might be mutagenic with an excess of new mutations in the vicinity of recombination break points. As it is conjectured that domesticated taxa have higher recombination rates than wild ones, we expect domesticated taxa to have raised mutation rates. Here, we use parent–offspring sequencing in domesticated and wild peach to ask (i) whether recombination is mutagenic and (ii) whether domesticated peach has a higher recombination rate than wild peach. We find no evidence that domesticated peach has an increased recombination rate, nor an increased mutation rate near-recombination events. If recombination is mutagenic in these taxa, the effect is too weak to be detected by our analysis. While an absence of recombination-associated mutation might explain an absence of a recombination–heterozygozity correlation in peach, we caution against such an interpretation. ER -