A Critical Review of Discrete Soil Sample Data Reliability: Part 1—Field Study Results
Roger Brewer
John Peard
Marvin Heskett
10.6084/m9.figshare.4005258.v2
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_Critical_Review_of_Discrete_Soil_Sample_Data_Reliability_Part_1_Field_Study_Results/4005258
<p>Part 1 of this study summarizes data for a field investigation of contaminant concentration variability within individual, discrete soil samples (<i>intra-sample</i> variability) and between closely spaced, “co-located” samples (<i>inter-sample</i> variability). Hundreds of discrete samples were collected from three sites known respectively to be contaminated with arsenic, lead, and polychlorinated biphenyls. <i>Intra-sample</i> variability was assessed by testing soil from ten points within a minimally disturbed sample collected at each of 24 grid points. <i>Inter-sample</i> variability was assessed by testing five co-located samples collected within a 0.5-m diameter of each grid point. <i>Multi Increment</i> soil samples (triplicates) were collected at each study site for comparison. The study data demonstrate that the concentration of a contaminant reported for a given discrete soil sample is largely random within a relatively narrow (max:min <2X) to a very wide (max:min >100X) range of possibilities at any given sample collection point. The magnitude of variability depends in part on the contaminant type and the nature of the release. The study highlights the unavoidable randomness of contaminant concentrations reported in discrete soil samples and the unavoidable error and inefficiency associated with the use of discrete soil sample data for decision making in environmental investigations.</p>
2016-11-30 12:46:04
Soil sample
sampling theory
multi increment sample
incremental sampling methodology
environmental site investigation