Hicks, Damien M. Ouvrard, Pierre Baldock, Katherine C. R. Baude, Mathilde A. Goddard, Mark E. Kunin, William Mitschunas, Nadine Memmott, Jane Morse, Helen Nikolitsi, Maria Osgathorpe, Lynne M. G. Potts, Simon Robertson, Kirsty M. Scott, Anna V. Sinclair, Frazer Westbury, Duncan B. N. Stone, Graham Mean, median and quartile values for pollen volume /m<sup>2</sup>/day) for each meadow treatment type across all cities and surveys, showing significant difference groups (p < 0.05) by the post-hoc Tukey-Kramer-Nemenyi test. <p>Mean, median and quartile values for pollen volume /m<sup>2</sup>/day) for each meadow treatment type across all cities and surveys, showing significant difference groups (p < 0.05) by the post-hoc Tukey-Kramer-Nemenyi test.</p> nectar sugar mass;pollen volume;September 2013. Nectar sugar;Urban Flower Meadows Planted meadows;resource levels;Seed mix species;alternative meadow seed mixes;UK;British weed species;300 m 2 meadows;amenity grassland controls;Perennial meadows;resource quality information;seed mixes 2016-06-24
    https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Mean_median_and_quartile_values_for_pollen_volume_m_sup_2_sup_day_for_each_meadow_treatment_type_across_all_cities_and_surveys_showing_significant_difference_groups_p_0_05_by_the_post-hoc_Tukey-Kramer-Nemenyi_test_/3925305
10.1371/journal.pone.0158117.t002