%0 Generic %A Hicks, Damien M. %A Ouvrard, Pierre %A Baldock, Katherine C. R. %A Baude, Mathilde %A A. Goddard, Mark %A E. Kunin, William %A Mitschunas, Nadine %A Memmott, Jane %A Morse, Helen %A Nikolitsi, Maria %A Osgathorpe, Lynne M. %A G. Potts, Simon %A Robertson, Kirsty M. %A Scott, Anna V. %A Sinclair, Frazer %A Westbury, Duncan B. %A N. Stone, Graham %D 2016 %T Mean, median and quartile values for pollen volume /m2/day) for each meadow treatment type across all cities and surveys, showing significant difference groups (p < 0.05) by the post-hoc Tukey-Kramer-Nemenyi test. %U https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Mean_median_and_quartile_values_for_pollen_volume_m_sup_2_sup_day_for_each_meadow_treatment_type_across_all_cities_and_surveys_showing_significant_difference_groups_p_0_05_by_the_post-hoc_Tukey-Kramer-Nemenyi_test_/3925305 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0158117.t002 %2 https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6142806 %K nectar sugar mass %K pollen volume %K September 2013. Nectar sugar %K Urban Flower Meadows Planted meadows %K resource levels %K Seed mix species %K alternative meadow seed mixes %K UK %K British weed species %K 300 m 2 meadows %K amenity grassland controls %K Perennial meadows %K resource quality information %K seed mixes %X

Mean, median and quartile values for pollen volume /m2/day) for each meadow treatment type across all cities and surveys, showing significant difference groups (p < 0.05) by the post-hoc Tukey-Kramer-Nemenyi test.

%I PLOS ONE