Flowchart and comparisons of prediction accuracy. Ming-Huang Chen Wu-Lung R. Yang Kuan-Ting Lin Chia-Hung Liu Yu-Wen Liu Kai-Wen Huang Peter Mu-Hsin Chang Jin-Mei Lai Chun-Nan Hsu Kun-Mao Chao Cheng-Yan Kao Chi-Ying F. Huang 10.1371/journal.pone.0027186.g002 https://plos.figshare.com/articles/figure/_Flowchart_and_comparisons_of_prediction_accuracy_/385458 <p>(<b>A</b>) <b>The CMap analysis flowchart.</b> All eight sets from EHCO2 (Group 1), 100-member random sets, Frequent sets, and Clique sets (Group 2) were individually queried with CMap. Only drugs with a <i>p-value</i> of less than 0.05 and a negative enrichment score were retained. (<b>B</b>) <b>Comparison of the accuracy of predicted drugs from each set.</b> The top 10 drugs from each set were labeled according to their anti-cancer effects. (<b>C</b>) <b>The comparison of the Frequency sets and the Clique sets.</b> The average effectiveness of drugs was compared side by side.</p> 2011-11-07 01:30:58 comparisons