10.6084/m9.figshare.1255023.v3 John K Wiencke John K Wiencke Paige M Bracci Paige M Bracci George Hsuang George Hsuang Shichun Zheng Shichun Zheng Helen Hansen Helen Hansen Margaret R Wrensch Margaret R Wrensch Terri Rice Terri Rice Melissa Eliot Melissa Eliot Karl T Kelsey Karl T Kelsey A comparison of DNA methylation specific droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and real time qPCR with flow cytometry in characterizing human T cells in peripheral blood Taylor & Francis Group 2015 ddpcr pcr T cell proportions CD 3Z gene dna methylation demethylated CpG promoter sites flow cytometry qpcr 157 blood specimens blood CD 3 counts t cells FACS 2015-10-27 04:04:54 Dataset https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_comparison_of_DNA_methylation_specific_droplet_digital_PCR_ddPCR_and_real_time_qPCR_with_flow_cytometry_in_characterizing_human_T_cells_in_peripheral_blood/1255023 <div><p>Quantitating the copy number of demethylated CpG promoter sites of the CD3Z gene can be used to estimate the numbers and proportions of T cells in human blood and tissue. Quantitative methylation specific PCR (qPCR) is useful for studying T cells but requires extensive calibration and is imprecise at low copy numbers. Here we compared the performance of a new digital PCR platform (droplet digital PCR or ddPCR) to qPCR using bisulfite converted DNA from 157 blood specimens obtained from ambulatory care controls and patients with primary glioma. We compared both ddPCR and qPCR with conventional flow cytometry (FACS) evaluation of CD3 positive T cells. Repeated measures on the same blood sample revealed ddPCR to be less variable than qPCR. Both qPCR and ddPCR correlated significantly with FACS evaluation of peripheral blood CD3 counts and CD3/total leukocyte values. However, statistical measures of agreement showed that linear concordance was stronger for ddPCR than for qPCR and the absolute values were closer to FACS for ddPCR. Both qPCR and ddPCR could distinguish clinically significant differences in T cell proportions and performed similarly to FACS. Given the higher precision, greater accuracy, and technical simplicity of ddPCR, this approach appears to be a superior DNA methylation based method than conventional qPCR for the assessment of T cells.</p></div>